Bounce rates don’t usually “kind of” break.

They spike.

One day your cold emails are cruising. Next day you’re staring at a dashboard that looks like you accidentally mailed a list of 2014 addresses scraped from a PDF.

And the annoying part is how many different things can cause a bounce spike. Bad data. Bad sending. Bad domain. A tiny DNS change. One inbox provider deciding you look suspicious. Or just… you scaled too fast and the math finally caught you.

This post is the short, practical playbook I use when bounces jump suddenly. Not a “full deliverability guide” (we all have 47 of those bookmarked). This is triage.

You’re going to run 7 checks. In order. Fast. And by the end you’ll usually know what happened, what to fix, and what not to touch.

Quick definitions (so we don’t waste time later)

A bounce is a message that didn’t get delivered and got rejected.

There are two broad types:

• Hard bounce: permanent. Bad mailbox, bad domain, doesn’t exist, recipient server says “nope” for good.
• Soft bounce: temporary. Inbox full, rate limited, greylisted, message too big, temporary policy rejection.

In real life, providers don’t always label these cleanly. Some ESPs lump things together. Some servers lie. And sometimes a “soft” bounce is basically permanent because you’re blocked.

So… we’ll treat “bounce spike” as “delivery rejection spike” and focus on root cause.

What “spike” actually means (so you don’t panic over noise)

Before you do anything, confirm you’re not reacting to randomness.

A real spike looks like:

• You sent to similar volume as usual, but bounce % jumped 2x to 10x.
• Or you increased volume and bounce % rose more than expected.
• Or bounces cluster around a provider (Google, Microsoft, Yahoo).
• Or bounces cluster around a specific inbox/domain (like “all @company.com addresses bounce”).

If bounce rate moves from 0.6% to 0.9% on a tiny send, that’s not a spike. That’s Tuesday.

If it jumps from 0.8% to 6% overnight, yeah. Stop and check.

The one thing to do immediately (before the 7 checks)

Pause the bleeding.

• Pause new sends on the affected mailbox set (or at least throttle hard).
• Do not blast a “test” to the same list. That just adds more bounces and trains systems that you’re sloppy.
• If you have multiple inboxes, isolate which ones are impacted. Often it’s not all of them.

If you’re using a multi-inbox cold outreach tool (like PlusVibe), this is where rotation and throttling saves you. You can freeze the suspicious inboxes, keep the healthy ones sending lightly, and avoid turning a small issue into an account level meltdown.

1) Check the bounce reason codes first (pattern beats guesses)

This is the fastest win. Because bounce codes tell you whether you’re dealing with:

• invalid addresses (data problem)
• DNS/auth problems (infra problem)
• policy blocks (reputation problem)
• rate limiting (volume/ramp problem)
• provider specific issues (Microsoft being Microsoft, etc)

What to look for

Open your bounce logs (ESP, SMTP logs, outreach tool logs). Export if needed. Then scan for repeated phrases.

Common patterns:

Mailbox does not exist (data / list quality)

• “550 5.1.1 user unknown”
• “Recipient address rejected”
• “No such user”
• “The email account that you tried to reach does not exist”

Domain does not exist / DNS fail (data or DNS)

• “550 5.1.2 domain not found”
• “NXDOMAIN”
• “Host or domain name not found”
• “Could not resolve MX”

Policy / spam block (reputation/content)

• “550 5.7.1 message rejected”
• “blocked”
• “spam”
• “Message not accepted for policy reasons”
• “S3150” (some Microsoft codes)
• “This message violates our policies”

Rate limiting / throttling / greylisting (volume/ramp)

• “421 4.7.0 Temporary System Problem”
• “Try again later”
• “4.7.1”
• “exceeded sending limits”
• “Too many connections”
• “Deferred”

Auth failures (SPF/DKIM/DMARC)

• “550 5.7.26 unauthenticated email”
• “SPF fail”
• “DKIM signature invalid”
• “DMARC policy”

The shortcut call

• If most bounces are 5.1.1 style, skip ahead to Check #3 (data).
• If you see 5.7.x policy blocks, prioritize Check #5 and #6 (reputation + content).
• If you see 4.7.x deferrals, prioritize Check #4 (sending behavior).
• If you see auth/DNS language, go to Check #2 immediately.

Suggested image

(If you don’t have this image, create a simple screenshot style table with columns: Bounce code, Provider, Count, Likely cause.)

2) Verify SPF, DKIM, DMARC (and check if anything changed)

This is the “someone touched DNS” check.

Bounce spikes can happen right after:

• adding a new sending tool
• changing Google Workspace / Microsoft 365 settings
• switching domains
• changing DMARC policy to p=reject
• adding multiple SPF includes until it breaks

The fast checklist

SPF

• SPF record exists for the sending domain (the domain after the @ in your From).
• It contains the correct include for your sending service.
• It does not exceed the 10 DNS lookup limit.
• It ends with an appropriate mechanism (~all or -all).

SPF failures sometimes show as bounces, sometimes as spam placement issues. But with strict receivers, it can get rejected outright.

DKIM

• DKIM is enabled and signing.
• The selector matches what your DNS has.
• No typos in the TXT record (quotes, spaces, broken strings).

DMARC

• DMARC record exists and is valid.
• You didn’t accidentally set p=reject with misaligned SPF/DKIM.
• Alignment: your visible From domain must align with authenticated domains.

The easiest way to test quickly

• Use a DNS lookup tool (MXToolbox, Google Admin Toolbox Dig, Cloudflare DNS checker).
• Send one email to a diagnostic inbox that shows auth results (you can use Gmail and view “Show original”).

If you want a clean workflow inside an outreach stack, PlusVibe’s deliverability optimization features are basically built for this phase. Not because it magically fixes DNS, but because it helps you see the sending setup, inbox health, and campaign level deliverability signals in one place instead of juggling 5 tabs.

What “auth broke” looks like in real life

• Microsoft bounces suddenly.
• Gmail starts deferring.
• You get bounces mentioning “unauthenticated” or “5.7.26”.

If you confirm auth issues, stop here and fix DNS first. Sending more while broken just burns reputation.

Suggested image

3) Validate the list again (yes, even if you validated it already)

This is the most common reason for true hard bounce spikes in cold outreach. And it’s the least sexy.

List problems happen when:

• you changed lead source
• you imported a new batch
• enrichment filled emails with guesses
• you stopped filtering risky catch-all domains
• you sent to old leads sitting in your CRM forever
• you accidentally included role accounts or generic addresses
• you mixed personal + work emails in one go

The 3 minute segmentation that reveals the culprit

Break the sent list by:

1. Batch/import date
   Did bounces spike only for the newest import? That's your answer.
2. Source (Apollo, ZoomInfo, Clay, scraping, manual, referrals)
   One source often goes bad without you noticing.
3. Domain type
   Check free providers (gmail.com, outlook.com), SMB domains, enterprise domains, and "weird" TLDs separately to identify patterns.

If you see "all the bounces are on random SMB domains" that screams poor verification or fabricated addresses. If you see "all bounces are on one enterprise domain" that could be a block or a gateway rule.

Catch-all is the silent killer (kinda)

Catch-all domains accept mail for any address during SMTP check, which makes "verification" tricky. You can "verify" an email and still bounce later because the server accepts then rejects.

So if you suddenly increased your catch-all share, bounces can spike even though your verifier said you were fine.

This is why bulk email verification that tags catch-all, risky, unknown, and disposable properly matters. PlusVibe includes bulk verification, and the practical win is not "clean list good." It's being able to exclude risky segments quickly when your metrics shift.

What to do if list quality is the cause

1. Pause that segment.
2. Re-verify only that segment.
3. Tighten rules: drop risky/unknown contacts, limit catch-all volume, and avoid role accounts (info@, admin@, support@).
4. Make sure you are not emailing invalid syntax addresses (sounds obvious, happens constantly).

Suggested image

4) Check sending behavior: volume, ramp, throttling, and inbox rotation

Soft bounce spikes often come from sending behavior, not the list.

Common scenario: You were sending 30 per day per inbox, life was good. Then you scaled to 120 per day because you added a new sequence and… bam. Deferrals, temp failures, 4.7.x errors, sometimes even account restrictions.

The fast checks

A) Compare yesterday vs today per inbox

Look at:

• sends per day per inbox
• new threads started
• replies (sometimes replies drop before bounces rise)
• bounce type (soft vs hard)

If you see soft bounces rising first, it’s usually throttling.

B) Connection limits and concurrency

Some sending setups open too many SMTP connections or send too quickly in bursts. Receivers don’t like bursts.

C) Warm inboxes vs fresh inboxes

If you added fresh inboxes and pushed volume immediately, they can be the spike source. New inboxes need warm up and slow ramp.

This is exactly why a secure warm-up system matters. It’s not about “sending fake emails forever.” It’s about building consistent behavior and reputation signals so your real cold sends don’t look like a brand new spam operation.

PlusVibe’s warm-up + multi-inbox rotation/throttling setup is designed for this kind of scaling. The practical move is: cap per inbox volume, rotate sends, and avoid spikes.

What to do if behavior is the cause

• Drop volume 30% to 60% immediately.
• Increase delays.
• Reduce concurrency.
• Rotate across more inboxes rather than pushing one inbox hard.
• Let warm-up run for new inboxes before they carry real load.

Suggested image

5) Check domain and IP reputation signals (the “are we getting blocked?” question)

If you see policy rejections and 5.7.x style bounces, you might be hitting blocks.

This can happen even with a good list.

Reasons:

• your domain is new and now you’re at scale
• your sender reputation dropped from too many bounces/complaints
• your copy triggered filters
• you’re using tracking links that look sketchy
• you’re on shared infrastructure that got noisy (less common with major providers, but still)

Fast reputation checks (no deep forensic work yet)

A) Google Postmaster Tools (if you send to Gmail at scale)

If you have enough volume, Postmaster shows:

• domain reputation
• IP reputation
• spam rate
• feedback loop (limited)

If your reputation dropped around the same time as the spike, that’s a clue.

B) Microsoft SNDS (harder, but useful)

Microsoft has SNDS and other signals. Not always easy to set up quickly, but if your spike is Microsoft heavy, it’s worth it.

C) Blocklist checks

Check your domain and sending IP against common blocklists. Don’t obsess over tiny lists. Look for major ones.

The “gateway block” clue

If bounces cluster around:

• one company domain
• one security gateway pattern (Barracuda, Proofpoint, Mimecast)

Then you may be blocked at the gateway. That’s not “your list is bad.” It’s “their perimeter hates you.”

What to do if reputation is the cause

• Stop emailing the worst performing segment.
• Reduce volume.
• Improve list hygiene immediately.
• Simplify links and tracking.
• Run warm-up consistently.
• Consider using a dedicated sending domain for outbound if you’re mixing with your main domain (common best practice).

Suggested image

6) Check content and link structure (filters cause bounces too, not just spam folder)

This surprises people: some systems will reject the message at SMTP time based on content, especially if you look phishy.

So you get a “bounce” that is basically “blocked.”

Fast content checks

A) Did you change the template recently?

Even a small change can do it:

• adding a new link
• adding an image
• adding an attachment
• adding “Re:” in subject
• adding a calendar link
• adding too many variables that sometimes render weirdly

Roll back the last change as a test. Not forever. Just to confirm.

B) Link reputation

If you use:

• link shorteners
• redirect tracking domains
• unfamiliar subdomains
• too many links

That can trigger policy rejections.

Try sending a version with:

• zero links
• no HTML
• plain text only

If bounces drop, you found a major factor.

C) Personalization failures (quiet, but deadly)

Bad merge tags can create nonsense like:

• “Hi {first_name},”
• “Hi ,”
• “Hi FIRSTNAME,”

That increases complaints and can trigger filters over time. Not instantly always, but it stacks.

If you use AI personalization, keep it grounded. PlusVibe’s AI campaign creation and personalization can help, but only if your inputs are clean and you QA the output. AI will happily generate confident nonsense if your data is thin.

What to do if content is the cause

• Remove links temporarily.
• Use plain text for a week.
• Avoid attachments.
• Reduce aggressive sales language.
• Make the first email absurdly simple.
• Reintroduce links slowly and track impact.

Suggested image

7) Check infrastructure and configuration edge cases (the stuff nobody checks until it hurts)

If you did Checks 1 to 6 and it still doesn’t make sense, it’s usually something “small” like:

• From address mismatch (sending as alias without proper auth)
• Reply-to misconfigured
• sending domain differs from tracking domain in a suspicious way
• broken custom tracking domain DNS
• SSL issues on redirect domain (yes, sometimes)
• recent changes in Google/Microsoft admin settings
• mailbox suspended or restricted
• SMTP relay changes
• timezone scheduling causing burst sends at odd hours

The quickest way to smoke this out

Compare a “good day” vs “bad day” configuration:

• Which inboxes were used?
• Which domain?
• Which tracking domain?
• Which template version?
• Which sending provider?
• Which sequence?

You’re looking for a single variable.

Also: check if bounces are actually bounces

Sometimes what your tool calls a bounce is actually something else. For instance, it could be a reply that got miscategorized, an auto response, an out of office message, or a block message that looks like a bounce.

Export and spot check 20 examples manually. It’s boring. It works.

Suggested image

Use this when you’re in a rush.

If you see mostly 5.1.1 user unknown

• It’s list quality.
• Re-verify newest segments.
• Reduce catch-all and risky.
• Fix your enrichment rules.

If you see domain not found / MX fail

• Your list has garbage domains or typos.
• Or you’re parsing emails wrong.
• Validate domains before sending.

If you see 5.7.1 blocked / policy rejection

• It’s reputation and or content.
• Reduce volume, simplify message, remove links.
• Check auth alignment anyway.

If you see 4.7.x try again later

• You’re being throttled.
• Reduce per inbox volume, add delays.
• Ramp slower, rotate more inboxes, warm up.

If you see unauthenticated / 5.7.26

• SPF/DKIM/DMARC broke or misaligned.
• Fix DNS before sending anything else.

If I had to fix this under pressure, here’s my exact order.

1. Pause campaigns for the affected inboxes.
2. Export bounce logs and categorize top 3 reason patterns.
3. If auth suspected, run SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks immediately.
4. Segment bounces by lead source and import date.
5. Temporarily switch to plain text template with no links for a small controlled send (like 10 to 30).
6. Reduce volume and slow down intervals across all inboxes.
7. Re-verify and resend only to “safe” verified addresses.
8. Watch results per provider.

If you’re using PlusVibe, the nice part is you can do most of the operational moves without duct taping spreadsheets. Verification, inbox rotation, throttling, warm-up, and campaign analytics are in the same place. When bounces spike, speed matters more than “perfect.”

Subtle CTA, since it fits here: if you’re scaling outbound and you want fewer deliverability fire drills, take a look at PlusVibe at https://plusvibe.ai. The warm-up, verification, and multi-inbox controls are basically built for this exact scenario.

1) Sending more to “test”

If bounces are high, sending more just creates more bad signals. Test small, controlled.

2) Switching everything at once

People change template, domain, volume, and tool all in one day. Then when bounces spike, they have no idea which change caused it.

Change one variable. Measure. Then proceed.

3) Ignoring provider clustering

If all the bounces are Microsoft, stop staring at your Gmail tests. Look at Microsoft specific throttling and policy behavior.

4) Treating warm-up as optional

Warm-up is not a magic spell. But it is a baseline requirement when you’re doing cold outreach with multiple inboxes and scaling volume.

5) Over trusting “verified”

Verification reduces risk. It does not guarantee delivery. Catch-all and enterprise gateways still bite.

This varies a lot by niche and list source, but as a practical reference:

• Under 1%: great.
• 1% to 2%: acceptable, watch it.
• 2% to 5%: you have a problem. Fix list and sending behavior.
• Over 5%: stop and triage. You’re actively harming reputation.

If you’re consistently above 2%, you should assume your list process is leaking bad addresses or you’re pushing catch-all too hard.

Bounce spikes are one of those problems that feel chaotic, but they’re usually not. They’re patterned.

Run the checks in order:

1. Bounce codes and patterns
2. SPF/DKIM/DMARC
3. List validation and segmentation
4. Sending volume and throttling
5. Reputation and blocks
6. Content and links
7. Infra edge cases

Do that, and you’ll usually find the culprit in under an hour.

And if you want fewer of these days where you’re knee deep in logs at midnight, build your outbound stack so you can slow down fast, rotate inboxes, verify in bulk, and warm up properly. That’s the boring stuff that keeps the fun stuff working. PlusVibe is worth a look if you’re trying to keep deliverability steady while scaling.

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions)

What causes sudden spikes in email bounce rates?

Sudden spikes in email bounce rates can be caused by various factors including bad data, poor sending practices, domain issues, tiny DNS changes, inbox providers flagging your emails as suspicious, or scaling your email volume too quickly which triggers deliverability problems.

How can I identify if a bounce rate spike is real or just random noise?

A real bounce rate spike typically involves a 2x to 10x increase in bounce percentage with similar send volumes, clustering of bounces around a specific provider (like Google or Microsoft), or bounces concentrated on particular inbox domains. Small fluctuations like a rise from 0.6% to 0.9% on a small send are usually normal and not cause for alarm.

What immediate action should I take when I notice a bounce spike?

Immediately pause new sends to the affected mailbox set or throttle sending heavily to prevent further bounces. Avoid blasting test emails to the same list as it worsens the problem. If using multiple inboxes, isolate and freeze the impacted ones while continuing light sending from healthy inboxes to contain the issue.

How do bounce reason codes help diagnose bounce spikes?

Bounce reason codes provide clues about why emails are rejected. For example, '550 5.1.1 user unknown' indicates invalid addresses (data issues), '550 5.7.1 message rejected' suggests policy or reputation blocks, '421 4.7.x' codes point to rate limiting or throttling, and SPF/DKIM/DMARC errors indicate authentication problems. Analyzing these codes helps prioritize which checks and fixes to perform first.

What are the key checks to perform after detecting a bounce spike?

After detecting a bounce spike, you should run seven quick checks: 1) Analyze bounce reason codes; 2) Verify SPF, DKIM, and DMARC settings especially if DNS changes occurred; 3) Review data quality for invalid addresses; 4) Examine sending behavior for volume or ramping issues; 5) Assess sender reputation; 6) Check email content for spam triggers; and 7) Inspect provider-specific issues.

Why is verifying SPF, DKIM, and DMARC important after a bounce spike?

Verifying SPF, DKIM, and DMARC is crucial because misconfigurations or recent changes in these authentication protocols can cause email rejections leading to bounce spikes. Changes such as adding new sending tools, switching domains, modifying DMARC policies to stricter enforcement like 'p=reject', or adjusting Google Workspace/Microsoft 365 settings often impact authentication and deliverability.